Bunker beds

Rafay

var nerd; nerd = db_getUser("rafay");
Messages
2,106
Location
Pakistan
An awful way to break your bones (and possibly, teeth) would be to sleep on the topmost bed. But the advantage, I think, is that, no one would be able to catch you doing the 'deed.' (Fapping, that is.)

The lowest bed is the most dangerous one, I believe. In case this whole structure breaks, the lowest bed owner would be crushed like crusty leaves under the foot.
 

Stybar

durrrr
Messages
11,683
Rafay said:
The lowest bed is the most dangerous one, I believe. In case this whole structure breaks, the lowest bed owner would be crushed like crusty leaves under the foot.
When you think of it, the only way the bottom bed would be completely crushed is when all 4 supports give away at the same time. Basically, there is a chance that you would have the least injuries when it breaks.
 

Rafay

var nerd; nerd = db_getUser("rafay");
Messages
2,106
Location
Pakistan
Stybar said:
Rafay said:
The lowest bed is the most dangerous one, I believe. In case this whole structure breaks, the lowest bed owner would be crushed like crusty leaves under the foot.
When you think of it, the only way the bottom bed would be completely crushed is when all 4 supports give away at the same time. Basically, there is a chance that you would have the least injuries when it breaks.
Yes, but what I think is: The one directly above the lowest one could trigger a sort of 'combined damage' if compromised. From the looks of it, if all the beds are in use (have weight), and the one above the lowest one so much as loses one support, the whole thing would collapse. Perhaps not on the lowest bed, but sideways; although that is very unlikely.
 

Mave

TMS Founder
Administrator
Messages
140,238
Location
Belgium
Rafay said:
Stybar said:
Rafay said:
The lowest bed is the most dangerous one, I believe. In case this whole structure breaks, the lowest bed owner would be crushed like crusty leaves under the foot.
When you think of it, the only way the bottom bed would be completely crushed is when all 4 supports give away at the same time. Basically, there is a chance that you would have the least injuries when it breaks.
Yes, but what I think is: The one directly above the lowest one could trigger a sort of 'combined damage' if compromised. From the looks of it, if all the beds are in use (have weight), and the one above the lowest one so much as loses one support, the whole thing would collapse. Perhaps not on the lowest bed, but sideways; although that is very unlikely.
Actually the most dangerous position would probably be not in one of the beds but next to the stack. If that 'tower' falls over on you... RIP.
The lowest bed is also pretty dangerous, but the chances of the stack collapsing at a 90 degree angle are pretty low I think.
 

Rafay

var nerd; nerd = db_getUser("rafay");
Messages
2,106
Location
Pakistan
Mave said:
Rafay said:
Stybar said:
Rafay said:
The lowest bed is the most dangerous one, I believe. In case this whole structure breaks, the lowest bed owner would be crushed like crusty leaves under the foot.
When you think of it, the only way the bottom bed would be completely crushed is when all 4 supports give away at the same time. Basically, there is a chance that you would have the least injuries when it breaks.
Yes, but what I think is: The one directly above the lowest one could trigger a sort of 'combined damage' if compromised. From the looks of it, if all the beds are in use (have weight), and the one above the lowest one so much as loses one support, the whole thing would collapse. Perhaps not on the lowest bed, but sideways; although that is very unlikely.
Actually the most dangerous position would probably be not in one of the beds but next to the stack. If that 'tower' falls over on you... RIP.
The lowest bed is also pretty dangerous, but the chances of the stack collapsing at a 90 degree angle are pretty low I think.
Yeah, that's what I said -- 'sideways.'
 
Top